// Israli Police arrest Arabcitizen for being stoned by Jews for driving while arab
    Peace be upon you,
    Welcome to Madinat Al-Muslimeen, the City of the Muslims. Please feel free to visit the different hot spots around the Madina and post any discussion, articles, suggestions, comments, art, poetry, events, recipes, etc etc. Basically anything you would like to share with your sisters and brothers!! Non-muslims are also of course quite welcome to share their comments. If this is your first time here, you need to register with the city council. Once you register you have 15 days to post your mandatory introduction and then you will be upgraded to a Madina Citizen, God Willing. Please note that our city does have regulations which are listed in the city constitution. Read them carefully before moving in. P.S. - You can also post anonymously if you wish. P.S.S. - Also be sure to check out our ARCHIVES from 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 & 2007. :)

Random Quote: 'The adab to look at the creation is to see the Creator behind the creation'- Shaykh Hamza Yusuf
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Israli Police arrest Arabcitizen for being stoned by Jews for driving while arab  (Read 718 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« on: Oct 11, 2008 12:00 PM »

Israel's own religious fanatics
The problem with any country fashioned along religious lines is that moderates get buried under rocks and a stream of abuse
Comments (108)

    * Seth Freedman
          o Seth Freedman
          o guardian.co.uk,
          o Friday October 10 2008 11.00 BST
          o Article history

During Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar, the port city of Akko erupted into race riots, after a clash between Jewish and Arab residents escalated into a battle involving hundreds of willing participants. The initial incident was sparked by a handful of Jews hurling rocks at an Arab man, after they took umbrage at his decision to drive through the Jewish side of town on Yom Kippur, an act that apparently offended their religious sensitivities.

When word of their attack spread around the Arab community, the response was swift, and as utterly unacceptable as the initial violence meted out by the Jewish attackers. Mobs of Arab locals went on a rampage, smashing cars and vandalising shops belonging to Jews, until police took control of the streets and forced them to a halt. As soon as the Israeli press got back to work after the Yom Kippur hiatus, the reaction was fast and furious, with both sides rushing to condemn the other via the media.

When I likened the wanton destruction I witnessed in Nil'in to a pogrom, I was hauled over the coals by my detractors for the language I employed. A few months on, and it appears that the word is enjoying something of a renaissance: Ehud Olmert using it to describe a wave of settler attacks on Arab villages, and – last night – at least three MKs calling the Yom Kippur war in Akko a pogrom, albeit from polar opposite sides of the spectrum.

Yuval Steinitz, a firebrand Likud politician took the view that "Israel has become the only country in the world where pogroms against Jews are taking place"; hot on his heels came Estherina Tartman's racist outburst, in which she claimed "The pogrom in Akko is another proof that the Arabs of Israel are the real threat to the state". Countering these claims was Ahmed Tibi, one of Israel's few Arab parliamentarians, who called the events a "Jewish pogrom", accusing the police of discriminating against Arab residents of the city during the disturbances.

Last night, a second round of clashes brought heavy police intervention, with the mixed city seemingly unwilling or unable to return to its pre-Yom Kippur state of calm and tolerance. While there is little doubt that what took place during the disturbances definitely walked and quacked like a pogrom, focusing on the symptoms rather than the disease is an unhelpful way of addressing the situation.

That anyone should feel so affronted by a non-Jewish citizen driving his car on Yom Kippur that they hurl rocks in response is as absurd a reaction as the recently-exposed ultra-orthodox vigilantes in Jerusalem, who take the law into their own hands to uphold religious law. For a country so determined to criticise – rightly – the Taliban-style behaviour of many Arab states, it is incredible that such practices are not clamped down upon when they occur closer to home.

Religious fervour has an alarming way of dragging its followers, and their unfortunate victims, back to Bible times. Stoning women in Iran is matched by stoning Arabs – or anyone else – daring to contravene Jewish law in Israel; the violators apparently deserving to be injured or killed for simply exercising the free will that the modern world extends to them.

I spent the entirety of Yom Kippur in synagogue, paying no attention whatsoever to what others might or might not be doing while I was fasting and praying. The only way I could have been offended by others' actions would have been if it directly impeded on my ability to carry out my religious obligations: if anyone had played music beneath the synagogue's windows, for example. However, catching sight of the hundreds of cyclists who come out of the woodwork every Yom Kippur wasn't offensive in the slightest; their violations of the day being their look-out, and no one else's.

The inherent problem with any country fashioned along religious lines is that the moderates get buried under a pile of rocks and a stream of abuse; a state of affairs to which both Israel and Gaza can attest. Jews attack other Jews for daring to contravene the seating arrangements on "modesty buses"; Palestinians do likewise to their non-believing brethren in similar acts of fundamentalist rage.

Sceptics will say that Akko was a tinderbox waiting to explode, and that religious sensibilities played little part in the initial outburst of violence, in the same way that Sharon's infamous tour of al-Aqsa was dismissed by rightwingers as incidental to the outbreak of the second intifada. However, the fact remains that politicians and commentators alike have been only too quick to jump on the religious bandwagon, claiming to be mortally hurt by the Arab driver's actions, as though Israel's otherwise untainted religious purity was irredeemably stained by his decision to – quite legally – drive on Yom Kippur.

The local police chief described the incident as a "deliberate provocation" by the driver, while saying precious little about the decision by his assailants to resort to hurling rocks and bottles to express their displeasure. But in that case, why don't the police end the nationwide tradition of bike-riding on Yom Kippur, if such acts are deemed to be a provocation to those adhering to religious law? The answer's pretty clear, and gives the lie to any claim that Israel is any more tolerant than its peers in the Arab world.

There is much to be said for respecting others' religions and customs, but at the same time "your freedom ends where my nose begins" cannot – and must not – be allowed to extend to a national scale. When that happens, and when the state apparatus fails to condemn such behaviour, then the game is well and truly up. And all the screams of "pogrom" in the world won't cover up who the true Cossacks are in such a case.
Sr. Member

Reputation Power: 3
Faizah has no influence :(
Gender: Female
Posts: 365

« Reply #1 on: Oct 11, 2008 04:58 PM »

As salaamu alaikum

It's incidents like these that keep the negative energy going on all sides and in so many places.  Religious tolerance is a two-way street but there sadly seems to be more of an expectation that Muslims should be the tolerant ones even to the extent that we alter our own ways in favor of others.

Okay so maybe the driving on the street was an offense but certainly not one that justified physical attack that escalated to more violence and vandalism.  Who is to blame for the high tensions?  Media? Government? Ordinary people?

Each time I read about such things my heart weeps and I pray harder for peace /harmony and true tolerance.

« Reply #2 on: Oct 11, 2008 11:13 PM »

The attack has a context. Most Israeli ”Jews” are atheists who call themselves Jews purely in a racial sense.
When Israel was first established few religious Jews went there as Zionism goes against the Talmud that states Jews are not allowed to establish Israel until Dejjal comes to lead them.
Because there are more Muslims between the river and the sea than Jews, Israel needed more Jews to come in so they can claim to be a democracy while treating the Muslims and Christian majority as vermin.
They did this by offering religious Jews large amounts of money and exempting them from taxes and military services so they can still claim that they are not Zionists and have nothing to do with Israel while living in Israel with all the benefits American taxes can pay for.
When the numbers of these religious Jews grow they started imposing religion on other Jews like this thread:


This included attacks on Jews who drove on the Sabeth etc.
Since then Zionists atheist Jews have started using this religious argument to attack Muslims and Christians as a means to make them leave.
This isn’t really anything to do with disrespect of that day because driving on that day isn’t illegal, is wide spread amongst most Israeli Jews as most of them are atheists and don’t follow any aspect of Judaism anyway. Jews do not expect Muslims to follow their law of not working on certain days as they need Muslims to do the work for them on those days. Israeli Jews have a bike racing tradition on that day when such things are forbidden, and this bike race was completely ignored by that mob even though it went through their area.
They want to bring in people claiming to be Jews from the former Soviet Union, to do this they need more Arabs to leave. This is just a way of getting Arabs to sell up cheaper. They do this in London too.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to: