Australia-South Africa Cricketism: From fix to confusion
-From DR. ABDUL RUFF
[Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal, Specialist on State Terrorism ;Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA); Commentator on world affairs, Analyst on Middle East, Chronicler of Foreign occupations & Freedom movements (Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc.) Former university Teacher; website: abdulruff.wordpress.com/mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
After a draw in the firs test, Australia-South Africa teams in Australia might have gone for a perfect fix in favor of the hosts, and they began executing the theme by making host Australia look stronger with about 5oo runs on the first day itself of 5day long test. But day 2 saw a change in SA approach and they offered very little runs, began removing batboys quickly letting Australia make about 550 runs total. The SA also hoping for big total in reply began some what normally but could get only about 360 runs. But in the second innings SA became serious and offered only 140 runs while Australia became too tough with SA, taking quack wickets. In the beginning SA lost 4 quick wickets. Afterwards the game changed the course and SA stuck to ground. Maybe Australians wanted to leak runs without wickets for some time and finally pluck the remaining wickets. However, SA did not let Australia win the match and forced a draw.
In fact, South Africa escaped from the jaws of a certain loss because nothing was in its favor throughout and Australia had almost pocketed the win. Lyon bowled much better so was Peter Siddle. Siddle is down on his hunches, he gave it all that he had but could not get a win. So, relief for South Africa, they go to Perth with a 0-0 scoreline. It did not look like it when they were 45/4 mid-way through the fourth day. No praise can be enough for Faf du Plessis, he was just a replacement player for J P Duminy who got injured on the first day of the Gabba Test. Plessis stood the ground till the end, helping the team to reach a draw. He did not lose focus even after the dismissal of Jacques Kallis as he marshaled the lower order quite superbly. A new star has been born, a pity that it took South Africa, unwilling like India to change the team for some fake reasons, a lot of time realize that. Maybe he was lucky...
SA allowed double tons to Australian skipper Clarke but his team could not win. Obviously, Australia would think they should have won this Test after having South Africa four down at stumps on the fourth day. Both teams gave it their all on the final day - Australia threw everything they had at South Africa, and South Africa were determined to save the game. Du Plessis is the hero, and clearly the Man of the Match for his performance in both innings. What a sparkling debut. Spare a thought for Siddle, he somehow conjured up the energy for a final burst and removed Kleinvedlt with a beauty but Morne Morkel though failed as a bowler, held his ground as a strong batboy when it was absolutely necessary and earned the draw along with Faf du Plessis. Faf du Plessis could not get Styen play with him as he went back to pavilion with a duck. Styen failed both as a bowler and batboy.
India has admitted that England has humiliated Indians in India by thrashing Indian team in Mumbai from where SRT or Sachuin Tendulekar- a major Hindu god but fallen cricketer - hails.
Two innings are necessary for the cricket frauds to easily make sufficient adjustments for creating bogus records! But what has happened in Aus-RSA test 2 and why?
But how long will cricket be played exclusively for 100s and 200 etc and for fake records?
ICC must answer a valid question now: why did the SA bowlers offer about 500 runs on the day one and why Australia could not win the match even with that big favor on day one in the first innings which usually favor the side bating first? Many MPs who worship Sachin as a god perhaps think if he is in the team India can win every match and there cannot be cricketism without him. Sachuin should have been grateful that he has been nominated to Parliament and called it a day from cricketism gimmicks on his own.
In case ICC has no answer, Australian premier who is fond of offering the nation’s highest awards to cricketism frauds should attempt an answer!
د. عبد راف
Global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by CIA & other anti-Islamic agencies. Regimes often resort to state terrorism.Terrorism is caused by anti-Islamic forces. Fake democracies like USA, Israel and India have zero-tolerance to any criticism of their anti-Muslim and other aggressive practices. Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than "terrorism" Anti-Islamic forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the world and they in disguise are harming genuine interests of ordinary Muslims