Peace be upon you,
    Welcome to Madinat Al-Muslimeen, the City of the Muslims. Please feel free to visit the different hot spots around the Madina and post any discussion, articles, suggestions, comments, art, poetry, events, recipes, etc etc. Basically anything you would like to share with your sisters and brothers!! Non-muslims are also of course quite welcome to share their comments. If this is your first time here, you need to register with the city council. Once you register you have 15 days to post your mandatory introduction and then you will be upgraded to a Madina Citizen, God Willing. Please note that our city does have regulations which are listed in the city constitution. Read them carefully before moving in. P.S. - You can also post anonymously if you wish. P.S.S. - Also be sure to check out our ARCHIVES from 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 & 2007. :)

Random Quote: If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. - Mark Twain
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: NSA refuses to say "if" it wiretapped lawyers of Guantanamo detainees  (Read 771 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hero Member

Reputation Power: 279
jannah is awe-inspiring mA!jannah is awe-inspiring mA!jannah is awe-inspiring mA!jannah is awe-inspiring mA!jannah is awe-inspiring mA!jannah is awe-inspiring mA!jannah is awe-inspiring mA!jannah is awe-inspiring mA!jannah is awe-inspiring mA!jannah is awe-inspiring mA!jannah is awe-inspiring mA!jannah is awe-inspiring mA!
Gender: Female
Posts: 7144

I heart the Madina

« on: Jun 26, 2008 06:58 AM »

Constitution??? What Constitution/?? ---J.

Court: NSA can refuse to say if lawyers wiretapped Wed Jun 25, 7:18 PM ET

WASHINGTON - The National Security Agency does not need to tell lawyers
for Guantanamo Bay detainees whether their phones were tapped as part of
the Bush administration's domestic surveillance program, a federal judge
ruled Wednesday.

The NSA has refused to say whether it listened in on the conversations of
the lawyers who are advising detainees being held at the U.S. naval
facility in Cuba. The NSA says even confirming the existence of such
wiretaps would jeopardize national security.

A federal judge in New York agreed, saying the super-secret agency can't
be forced to disclose information about the program.

"Confirming or denying whether plaintiffs' communication with their
clients has been intercepted would reveal information about the NSA's
capabilities and activities," U.S. District Judge Denise Cote wrote.

President Bush acknowledged in 2005 that, for years following the Sept.
11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the NSA intercepted international phone
conversations and e-mails involving U.S. citizens. The program did not
require warrants and operated without oversight from the nation's spy
court, which normally approves wiretaps of suspected terrorists and spies.

Since lawyers don't know whether their phones are tapped, some have
avoided international phone calls and e-mails with clients and family
members, said Shayana Kadidal, an attorney for the Center for
Constitutional Rights.

When calls must be made, "It means we begin conversations with, 'We can't
be certain the government isn't listening in on this call,'" Kadidal said.

Under the Freedom of Information Act, the lawyers demanded to know whether
their calls were intercepted. The NSA refused to confirm or deny the
existence of such records. Such a response is allowed when acknowledging
the mere existence of a document would compromise intelligence operations.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to: